|
"Sir No Sir"
— The
Mark of a Real Man
Mothers' Day
Was Conceived for
National and Global Peace!
|
Julia Ward Howe
Born:
May 27, 1819, New York, New York.
Died:
October 17, 1910, Middletown, Rhode Island.
Buried:
Mount Auburn Cemetery, Cambridge, Massachusetts. |
Mothers Doing
What?
by Ruth Rosen
THIS
SUNDAY IS Mother's Day. Restaurants are already booked for brunches and
dinners. The flower, candy and card industries await their annual spike
in sales.
This
is soooo 20th century. The women who conceived Mother's Day would be
bewildered by our rituals. They would expect us to be marching in the
streets, not honored for our individual sacrifices.
That's because the idea of a mother's day began with women's public
activism. In 1858, Anna Reeve Jarvis, a young Appalachian homemaker,
organized Mothers' (not Mother's) Work Days in West Virginia to improve
the sanitation and decrease the deaths caused by polluted water.
In
1872, Julia Ward Howe, author of the "Battle
Hymn of the Republic," proposed an annual Mothers' Day for Peace.
Horrified by the casualties of the American Civil and Franco-Prussian
wars, Howe asked, "Why do not the mothers of mankind interfere in these
matters to prevent the waste of that human life of which they alone bear
and know the cost?"
For
the next 30 years, Americans celebrated Mothers' Day for Peace on June
2. In 1907, Anna Jarvis, the daughter of the original West Virginian
organizer, launched a campaign to establish a national Mother's Day.
Heavily lobbied by the flower and card industries, Congress declared in
1914 that Mother's Day would be celebrated on the second Sunday in May.
But
the holiday did not last as a day to promote peace. The growing consumer
culture gradually redefined Mother's Day as a celebration of each
woman's private sacrifices. As the Florists' Review, a trade journal, so
bluntly put it, "This was a holiday that could be exploited."
And
so it was. The embryonic advertising industry taught Americans how to
honor their mothers -- by buying flowers. Outraged by florists, who sold
each carnation for the exorbitant price of $1, Anna Jarvis tried to
fight against those who "would undermine Mother's Day with their greed."
Clearly, she failed. But growing numbers of women have been resurrecting
her mother's 19th-century vision of Mother's Day. On Sunday, in
Washington and 15 other American cities, thousands of women are holding
peace rallies and parades. In Albuquerque, Boulder, Cincinnati and Los
Angeles, for example, "Mothers Acting Up" have organized events to
promote peaceful solutions to conflict.
Closer to home, women in the Bay Area are sponsoring two Mother's Day
peace celebrations, both meant to entertain and engage the entire
family. On Saturday, dozens of interfaith, peace and justice
organizations are sponsoring a "Mother's Day Speak-up for Peace" event
at 1 p.m. in Lindley Meadow, in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park.
Between 1 and 3 p.m. on Sunday, at Berkeley's Martin Luther King Jr.
Memorial Park (at Martin Luther King Jr. Way and Center Street),
folksinger Betsy Rose will be joined by musicians and poets, followed by
prayers and reflections for peace.
In
addition to promoting peace, some women activists are using Mother's Day
as an occasion to publicize the fact that our nation reveres the idea of
motherhood more than actual mothers.
According to Save the Children's annual index, which measures the
well-being of mothers and children, the U.S. ranks 11th among 117 other
countries. We may be a military superpower, but we resemble a developing
nation when it comes to providing mothers with child care, job training,
health care, an adequate minimum wage and paid parental leave.
Nineteenth-century women dared to dream of a day that encourages women
to use their influence to promote peace. At the dawn of a new century,
we can best honor their vision with our own civic engagement and
activism. For Bay Area Mother's Day information:
www.unitedforpeace.org/ and
www.peacehost.net/EPI-Calc/
"Why do not the mothers of mankind interfere in these matters to
prevent the waste
of that human life of which they alone bear
and know the cost?"
–
Julia
Ward Howe
Mother's Day Proclamation of 1870
by Julia Ward Howe, inspired author,
Battle Hymn of the
Republic
Arise
then...women of this day!
Arise, all women who have hearts!
Whether your baptism be of water or
of tears!
Say firmly:
"We will not have questions answered
by irrelevant agencies,
Our husbands will not come to us,
reeking with carnage,
For caresses and applause.
Our sons shall not be taken from us
to unlearn
All that we have been able to teach
them of charity, mercy and patience.
We, the women of one country,
Will be too tender of those of
another country
To allow our sons to be trained to
injure theirs."
From the bosom of a devastated Earth
a voice goes up with
Our own. It says: "Disarm! Disarm!
The sword of murder is not the
balance of justice."
Blood does not wipe out dishonor,
Nor violence indicate possession.
As men have often forsaken the
plough and the anvil
At the summons of war,
Let women now leave all that may be
left of home
For a great and earnest day of
counsel.
Let them meet first, as women, to
bewail and commemorate the dead.
Let them solemnly take counsel with
each other as to the means
Whereby the great human family can
live in peace...
Each bearing after his own time the
sacred impress, not of Caesar,
But of God -
In the name of womanhood and
humanity, I earnestly ask
That a general congress of women
without limit of nationality,
May be appointed and held at
someplace deemed most convenient
And the earliest period consistent
with its objects,
To promote the alliance of the
different nationalities,
The amicable settlement of
international questions,
The great and general interests of
peace.
* * *
|
Hiding It in the Dark
The Secret
Policy to Base America's Economy
on Military Growth Rather than for Social
Progress of the Nation
Interview with Brian Bogart
* * *
The Winter Soldier
—
Support Them for the Preservation
of the Nation and the Planet
Hundreds of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans Gather in Washington DC for
Winter Soldier
The term, Winter Soldier, is a play on the words
of Thomas Paine who wrote in “The Crisis” (1776) that summer soldiers,
“shrink from the service of their country” in times of crisis. In
contrast, Winter Soldiers are those who stand up for the
soul of their nation
in its darkest hours.
Iraq Veterans
Against the War
To mark five years
of the U.S. occupation of Iraq, Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW)
will gather beginning today through Sunday at the National Labor College
near Washington, D.C. to disclose the realities of U.S. war policy in a
public investigation called “Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan”.
Veterans and
civilian survivors of both conflicts will give public testimony and
share the eyewitness stories that have been censored from the American
public about the true human cost of these occupations. This testimony
also will reveal how the Iraq occupation is tactically un-winnable,
morally wrong, and has brought our military to its breaking point.
Winter Soldier: Iraq
& Afghanistan aims to:
Motivate veterans and active duty service members
to get involved in today’s growing GI resistance movement;
SIR, NO SIR!
1. Awaken America to the real human costs of war
that have not been exposed sufficiently by the American media;
http://www.planetization.org/iraqtruth.htm
2. Hold both Democrats and Republicans accountable
for the illegal Iraq and Afghanistan occupations they have jointly kept going.
"I'm not fighting for these bastards"
3. The term, Winter
Soldier, is a play on the words of Thomas Paine who wrote in “The
Crisis” (1776) that summer soldiers, “shrink from the service of their
country” in times of crisis. In contrast, Winter Soldiers are those who
stand up for the soul of their nation in its darkest hours.
America’s
democracy is in crisis today, motivated by an economic addiction to oil
and empire, engaged in ongoing illegal occupation that has cost the
lives of hundreds of thousands, and stymied by a political process that
values moneyed interests more than the majority of the American people.
Over 35 years after
the first Winter Soldier investigation conducted by Vietnam Veterans
Against the War, America needs Winter Soldiers again. Continuing in this
tradition, IVAW’s Winter Soldiers are performing a difficult but
essential service to our country.
For the past five
years, Americans have heard from generals, pundits, and politicians
about the occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan, but they haven't heard
enough from those who have first-hand experience.
From incidents like
Fallujah and Abu Ghraib to the awarding of no-bid contracts, Winter
Soldier will show that wrongdoings and failures in Iraq and Afghanistan
are part and parcel of war policy set at the highest levels of power.
Troops are being ordered to do things that violate their conscience and
the rules of war.
As hundreds gather
to hear the Winter Soldier testimony in Silver Spring, Maryland,
thousands will gather simultaneously in their homes, houses of worship,
on college campuses, and on military bases around the globe to bear
witness to these stories via live broadcast. The Winter Soldier: Iraq &
Afghanistan proceedings will be carried via satellite on the Deep Dish
network, Free Speech and Link T.V., public access television stations,
the Pacifica Radio network, and via web streaming on
www.ivaw.org.
The horrible, honest reality of the American
occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan like you haven’t heard it before.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19536.htm
War Deceives!
* * * |
To the Brave, The Noble and
the Free: WE SALUTE YOUR HUMANITY
Because War is an Inhuman Enterprise
"People Must Decide, Not Governments"
“The only way to
bring peace to the world is to let the people of the world decide for
themselves what they want to spend their efforts on. I feel that in this
day and age governments start wars, and not people, and since the
governments want the wars then why don't we let the government fight the
war? All of the politicians that want to fight a war are free to trade
places with me at any time. I will gladly go and
learn
war no more."
“To those who
have called me a coward I say that they are wrong, and that without
knowing it, they are also right. They are wrong when they think that I
left the war for fear of being killed. I admit that fear was there, but
there was also the fear of killing innocent people, the fear of putting
myself in a position where to survive means to kill, there was the fear
of losing my soul in the process of saving my body, the fear of losing
myself to my daughter, to the people who love me, to the man I used to
be, the man I wanted to be. I was afraid of waking up one morning to
realize my humanity had abandoned me.”
—Sgt. Camilo
Mejia
* * *
“War is the
greatest form of wrong. I believe that my moral obligation to humanity
is to not allow myself to be a part of this destruction. …
“Why do we want
to train the young people in the world that the only way we can settle
our differences is to kill one another? Why shouldn't we train them to
become surgeons or homebuilders? Why shouldn't we train to become
anything but killers? I think that the world would be better off if we
were to do that instead. I have talked to veterans from every war from
WWII on and their opinion is that the wars they fought were to be the
last war ever fought. How many more are we going to fight before we
realize that the act of war is for small minded people that are intent
in only satisfying their own needs and not the needs of the people in
general? I do not want to be killed because I am living in a place that
has a ruler that wants to go to war with any one.
“The only way to
bring peace to the world is to let the people of the world decide for
themselves what they want to spend their efforts on. I feel that in this
day and age governments start wars, and not people, and since the
governments want the wars then why don't we let the government fight the
war? All of the politicians that want to fight a war are free to trade
places with me at any time. I will gladly go and learn war no more.
“There are
activities that I have been involved in that have led me to these new
and developed beliefs, and they are numerous but I can tell you some of
them. When you walk in the woods and you see a deer stand and look at
you, or you are on the river in the morning and the mist rises off the
water while you hear the morning calls of the river birds, and the
otters just lie there as you glide past in your boat and don't even
move, you know that there is a better way. When you can find solitude
in the woods that are so filled with peace and the wildlife that is all
around you, you feel the better way all around. A person must
acknowledge the fact the we are a part of the universe and the universe
does not want to be out of sorts with itself, so why do we spend so much
effort on trying to be out of sorts with others of the human race?”
“Breaking Ranks to Shun War” by David Zucchino
The First Military Officer to Refuse Iraq War
“I refuse to be silent any longer. I refuse to watch families torn
apart,
while the President tells us to “stay the course.” … I refuse to be
party to an illegal and immoral war against people who did nothing to deserve
our aggression. I wanted to be there for my fellow troops. But the
best way was not to help drop artillery and cause more death and destruction.
It is to help oppose this war and end it so that all soldiers can come home.”
-U.S. Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada
June 7, 2006
Family, Friends, Members of the Religious Community, Members of the
Press, and my fellow Americans—thank you for coming today. My name
is Ehren Watada. I am a First Lieutenant in the U.S. Army and I have
served for 3 years.
It is my duty as a commissioned officer of the United States Army to
speak out against grave injustices. My moral and legal obligation
is to the Constitution and not those who would issue unlawful orders.
I stand before you today because it is my job to serve and protect those
soldiers, the American people, and innocent Iraqis with no voice.
It is my conclusion as an officer of the Armed Forces that the war in
Iraq is not only morally wrong but a horrible breach of American law.
Although I have tried to resign out of protest, I am forced to
participate in a war that is manifestly illegal. As the order to take
part in an illegal act is ultimately unlawful as well, I must as an
officer of honor and integrity refuse that order.
The war in Iraq violates our democratic system of checks and balances.
It usurps international treaties and conventions that by virtue of the
Constitution become American law. The wholesale slaughter and
mistreatment of the Iraqi people with only limited accountability is not
only a terrible moral injustice, but a contradiction to the Army’s own
Law of Land Warfare. My participation would make me party to war crimes.
Normally, those in the military have allowed others to speak for them
and act on their behalf. That time has come to an end. I have
appealed to my commanders to see the larger issues of our actions. But
justice has not been forthcoming. My oath of office is to protect and
defend America’s laws and its people. By refusing unlawful orders for an
illegal war, I fulfill that oath today.
Thank you.
http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/
|
Weapons and War
"Stupid is, As Stupid Does"
—
Forrest Gump
|
Planet Earth the Latest Weapon of War
By
Rosalie Bertell
The
Women's Press, London, 2000.
Review
by Moyra Bremner. First published in Caduceus Magazine, issue 51, spring
2001
ALL
THINGS ARE CONNECTED
Rosalie Bertell's new book, "Planet Earth the Latest weapon of War",
reveals the unbelievable truth in the new generation of super-weapons.
Important books are rare - very rare. "Planet Earth the Latest Weapon of
War" is one such rarity. Like Rachel Carson's Silent Spring it deserves
to be read by everyone who cares a jot about their future. For it
reveals that, behind carefully spin doctored names like 'the Star Wars
project', the military is now testing radically new weapons which so
profoundly imperil the earth, and all life on it, that to deploy them in
the name of security is like suggesting that becoming a suicide-bomber
increases life expectancy.
----- As a distinguished American scientist, world expert on radiation,
and winner of major international awards for science, Dr Bertell is no
scaremonger. Yet her cool, incisive, fact-packed, prose not only reveals
weapons worthy of science fiction, but shows that testing them may be
costing thousands of innocent civilian lives - in peacetime.
----- She exposes how the military have, for decades, been secretly
conducting experiments, including high-level nuclear explosions, which
may disrupt the vital layers of the atmosphere which protect us from the
sun's lethal radiation. She says these experiments are often conducted
without even discussing with non-military experts the hazards of
damaging these life-preserving earth-veils. And she believes that such
experiments may already have accelerated global warming and contributed
to earthquakes and freak weather conditions.
----- The story unfolds gently. She tells us that, for four years, a
Russian thermonuclear bomb a thousand times more powerful than Hiroshima
bomb circled above our heads. And that a single rocket launched by the
US military merely carried enough plutonium to cause lung cancer in 20
million people - had it exploded like some of its non-loaded
predecessors.
Radiation belt
----- In July 1962 NASA announced that high altitude nuclear tests had
created a new radiation belt 750 miles deep, girdling the earth. This
damage and pollution was compounded by 'me too' experiments by the USSR.
Dr Bertell says it was 10 years before American scientists realised that
it would be hundreds of years before the vital earth-shielding Van Allen
belts of the earth's atmosphere would recover from such onslaughts.
----- However, the repercussions may not be limited to the atmosphere
itself. She says that, after one nuclear experiment, which created new
electromagnetic belts in the atmosphere, the caribou mysteriously failed
to migrate for the first time in 3000 years. A warning perhaps of how
the migration of animals, fish and birds may be affected by disturbances
to electromagnetic fields - and of the potential impact on man. For,
without the caribou, many Inuit people starved to death. Moreover, the
nuclear radiation was not confined to the upper atmosphere: caribou and
people who survived were dangerously contaminated with caesium 137, and
cancer, lung disease and infant mortality soared.
----- Despite opposition from the International Union of Astronomers,
the US military even put 350,000,000 copper needles into orbit. An
experiment which Dr Bertell says some scientist believed may have upset
the balance of the planetary magnetic field, causing the massive 8.5
Alaskan earthquake and losing Chile part of its coast. Yet she shows
that such experiments are small beer compared with what is being done
today - and is to come.
HAARP - Ionosphere modification
----- For example, she describes HAARP (America's High-frequency Active
Auroral Research Programme) a multimillion pound 'civilian'
installation, hidden away in Alaska, ostensibly intended to 'alter the
performance of communications and surveillance systems'. Seemingly
innocent enough, until she explains that this grid of 180 transmission
towers is funded by the military and is part of the 'Star Wars' defence
network. HAARP, and its linked brother projects are, she says, known to
the military as 'ionosphere modification facilities'. For, according to
the proposal for its installation, HAARP is intended to trigger and
control natural processes in the ionosphere in ways 'that could be
potentially exploited for department of Defence Purposes'. In other
words the ionosphere, which shelters the earth, will be used as the
barrel of the gun.
-----Dr Bertell suggests that so great is the power of such transmitters
that even living near them could be dangerous. She quotes a US federal
Environmental Impact statement which says that HAARP can 'raise the
internal body temperature of nearby people …(and) detonate aerial
munitions, scramble aircraft communications and flight controls'. Even
slight increases in body temperature can alter functioning of brain and
body and, as she points out, even a small rise in electromagnetic
radiation may cause an increase in cataracts and leukaemia and alter
brain and body chemistry, blood pressure and heart rates. But such
direct harm is the mere tip of the iceberg.
----- In one type of experiment these transmission towers will, Dr
Bertell reveals, combine to emit a giant beam, of such power that, 'in a
burst lasting more than a few minutes - it will slice through the
ionosphere like a microwave knife' producing a long incision in this
vital layer of the atmosphere. However, the main aim of HAARP is, she
explains, to heat sections of the ionosphere until they bulge to form a
curved 'lens' which will 'reflect' HAARP's massive energy beams back to
earth to destroy selected targets - presumably without leaving even a
trace of what caused the devastation.
----- The layers of our atmosphere are so little understood that no one
can possibly know the impact of cutting the ionosphere open, or of
making it bulge like a lens. Moreover, she points out that scientists
have warned that the energy from HAARP may combine with a natural wave
frequency with results which are 'quite disproportionate to the level of
input' - including disrupting the harmony between 'earth life
forms….and….earth's life support systems'.
----- The rings round Saturn are thought to have been caused by a
comparable interaction between energy waves. So, the possibility that
HAARP, and its confreres, might trigger catastrophic changes to this
planet cannot be ruled out. As Dr Bertell explains, everything is
connected, 'everything in our universe is in dynamic equilibrium and
this interference (from HAARP) may destabilise a system that has
established and maintained its own cycle for millions of years' -
protecting life on earth.
ELF pulsed into the earth
----- Nor is that all. Dr Bertell says that both HAARP and installations
in Russia - on which America has, remarkably, collaborated - can also
create pulsed, extremely low frequency (ELF) waves which have been
directed deep into the earth itself, potentially disrupting delicately
poised tectonic plates of the earth's crust, such as those of
California's San Andreas fault. Given the little understood interplay
between tectonic plates, volcano's and the earth's molten core, to call
this playing with fire would be an absurd understatement.
----- Nor, it seems are these the only military installations
threatening earth's viability. Dr Bertell tells us that HAARP is just
one of a growing chain of astonishingly powerful, and potentially
interactive, military installations, using varied types of
electromagnetic fields or wavelengths, each with a different ability to
affect the earth or its atmosphere. For example, an installation in
Alaska will have a magnetic field more than 60,000 times greater than
the earth itself.
----- To anyone who knows the impact of magnetic fields on the human
body the potential risks of such an installation are obvious. Equally,
as Dr Bertell points out, the earth's magnetic field is both produced by
electric currents in the earth's liquid core and interacts with the Van
Allen belts of the earth's atmosphere in ways not yet understood.
----- With typical restraint, she chooses not to guesstimate the effect
that a magnetic field 60,000 times greater than the earth's will have on
the earth's core or the atmosphere. Yet she believes that military tests
may already have disturbed earth equilibrium. In addition to showing how
earlier military tests have massively contributed to ozone depletion and
global warming Dr Bertell suggests that some freak weather conditions
and 'natural' disasters may have been directly caused by testing
installations such as HAARP.
Links to earthquakes and freak weather
----- For example, in 1977 a freak storm which devastated a small town
in Wisconsin and destroyed 350 hectares of forest, followed hot on the
heels of a government ELF wave experiment. While The Bulletin of the
Atomic Scientist reported that an ELF wave transmitter lay right in the
middle of another storm which brought down 150 - 200 times more rain
than normal. These links are more than purely circumstantial, for she
says that weather modification is on the US air force agenda, and in
1992 the Russians told the Wall Street Journal they could already
achieve it. And the Wisconsin storm offers what looks very much like
direct evidence.
----- The question is, does anyone have the wisdom to control weather
wisely, and unselfishly? And do they even begin to understand the
potential for unexpected side-affects from all these experiments. As she
points out, it is since the inception of Star Wars experiments that El
Nino has changed its cycle and become far more severe with devastating
effects.
----- Equally, a Soviet experiment with the ionosphere directly preceded
an earthquake in China which killed 650,000 people. While in America ELF
- type waves were detected immediately before a San Francisco earthquake
in 1989, and unnatural and unexplained low frequency waves were detected
before earthquakes in Japan and California in 1989, and before an
earthquake in Los Angeles in 1994. We can only wonder whether such ELF
waves preceded the recent earthquakes in El Salvador and India this
year, and whether the carnage has been caused by 'security experiments'
by one of the 'great powers'.
----- What is certain, as Dr Bertell shows, is that, globally, the
number of earthquakes a year has more than doubled since the inception
of military experiments which affect the earth and its atmosphere. Even
this could, of course, be mere coincidence but another fact suggests
something unusual is going on. Inexplicably, an earthquake in Bolivia in
1994 originated 600km below the earth's surface - 24 times deeper than
normal.
----- However, even if no such disasters can be laid at the door of the
world's military, weapons which interfere with the atmosphere violate
the 1976 Environment Modification Convention. Yet, she tells us that in
January 1991, despite America having signed that convention, the White
House waived the requirement for actions by the Pentagon to be assessed
for environmental impact. However, America and Russia are not alone in
possessing such weapons. Her revelations of 30 years of military
innovations show that Britain, Germany and NATO have all been involved
in military developments which show a cavalier disregard for life on
earth.
----- Dr Bertell is perhaps one of the few people in the world who could
write this book. As leader of medical commissions to both Bhopal and
Chernobyl she is skilled in unearthing facts from beneath mountains of
dis-information - accurately scooping the world's media, on the truth
about depleted uranium weapons, by more than a year. As a nun dedicated
to serving in the world she does not shrink from the unpopularity
accorded a messenger. And her standing as a scientist, personal
integrity, and evidence of meticulous research, challenge any yearning
to disbelieve her.
----- A long-standing opponent of nuclear weapons, she sees today's
military research as a 'cancer of the body politic' consuming human,
financial, and natural resources which are desperately needed elsewhere.
'I would liken society's dependence on the military to a family in which
one partner is addicted to something and claims a large proportion of
money for feeding the addiction'. As she points out, the billions
annexed by defence projects create the very deprivation which eventually
fosters war. Moreover, she says military research sequesters many top
scientists, 'This "brain drain" from the civilian economy may be
depriving us of those who could resolve the most serious survival
problems now facing the biosphere'.
----- This is not a comfortable, or easy, book and needs to be chewed
slowly, in small helpings. Yet it is well worth chewing and her overall
message is one of hope. She says we need to redefine the militaristic
word 'security' to mean 'the protection and responsible stewardship of
the Earth' - and redirect former military expenditure towards conflict
resolution, social justice and sustainable living. A change which, she
believes, can be achieved through active citizenship, global
co-operation, information exchange between caring people and
organisations, and the kind of peaceful pressure which, in 1996, led to
the International Court of Justice declaring the use of nuclear weapons
unlawful.
----- She concludes:
----- 'I hope this book has given readers some inspiration as to how the
might become involved in helping this peaceful planet evolve to its full
potential. Despite years of abuse, it is still an amazing and beautiful
creation. It deserves our best efforts. Enjoy it, love it, and save it'.
----- There she is wrong. It is not the planet which may die: it is us.
It is ourselves we must love enough to cherish the miraculous web of
life which radiates from the earth's core to the farthest limits of our
universe.
* * *
* *
|
Bertell Reveals Many New
Weapons of Mass Destruction
by Larry Ross, February 28, 2005
The book is: “Planet Earth the Latest Weapons of War” by Rosalie Bertell,
a distinguished and world-famous scientist. She is a winner of major
international awards for science. As a Catholic Nun she has dedicated
her life to her continuous work for humanity.
What she reveals is unbelievably stunning – almost stupefying. Even I
did not want to believe it at first, and I’ve been fighting against a
global nuclear doomsday for over 50 years. But her credentials are
impressive and impeccable.
She reveals how “the military is testing radically new weapons which
imperil the earth and all life on it. Such as HAARP, which heats
sections of the ionosphere until they bulge to form a curved ‘lens’
which will ‘reflect’ HAARP’s massive energy beams back to earth to
destroy selected targets. She thinks ‘HAARP may destabilize a system
that has established its own cycle for millions of years’ – protecting
life on earth.
Or ELF, which ‘creates pulsed, extremely low frequency waves which have
been directed deep into the earth itself, potentially disrupting
delicately poised tectonic plates of the earths crust’ Off the Coast of
Indonesia, tectonic plates in the Indian Ocean shifted to cause the
Boxing Day Tsunami, killing over 250,000 people in 2004.
Dr Bertell tells us that HAARP and ELF are some of ‘growing chain of
astonishingly powerful, and potentially interactive, military
installations, using varied types of electromagnetic fields or
wavelengths, each with a different ability to affect the earth or its
atmosphere’.
Did the Pentagon test HAARP on tectonic plates off Indonesia, thereby
causing the Boxing Day Tsunami? I don’t know, but I think there should
be a scientific investigation of the causes, with a HARRP test as one of
the possibilities. If the Pentagon has nothing to hide, they should
welcome such an opportunity.
A few facts: A danger is: ‘A HAARP installation in Alaska will have a
magnetic field more than 60,000 times greater than the earth itself’. A
potential result of tests is: …’Globally, the number of earthquakes a
year has more than doubled since the inception of military experiments
which affect the earth or its atmosphere’
Conclusion; the amount of sheer power available to the Bush
Administration, from their superpower nuclear arsenal, their other WMD,
and now HAARP, ELF and other devices, is mind-boggling. Adding up all
the risks, from nuclear weapons and their potential usage, to the new
weapons, it is likely that due to “accident, miscalculation, act of
madness, or faulty policy decision” a terminal global disaster will
occur.
Everything has been put in place, including thousands of nuclear
missiles on alert status, for a terminal disaster to occur. There are
huge resources in terms of people, money, machines and corporate
organizations – the biggest ever –devoted to increasing the preparations
to unleash what can quickly become a global disaster.
The most important factor of all is the human factor. The Bush
Administration is the most militaristic and dangerous in history –
unleashing wars, such as that on Iraq, based on lies as justification,
and creating pre-emptive war doctrines that sanction the use of nuclear
weapons. They are hostile to advice, even from conservative sources, and
proclaim the ‘truth’ as they decide it to be. They claim a vision of an
American Empire dominating the world, and a vision of a God-proclaimed
nuclear Armageddon in case things go wrong. They think the gamble is
worth it.
What we see in America today is an insane system. It is a
military/industrial juggernaut, in the grip of mad hubristic doctrines,
run by a power-crazed psychopathic but a superficially sane
Administration. They are dedicated, function effectively and sanely to
accomplish their objectives. They are willing to take any risk, and then
deny there is any risk.
They have committed many crimes so far. But like past war criminals,
will always claim such crimes are not crimes, but justified steps to
achieve their objectives. They are unlikely to turn back or learn any
lessons. They define the truth as they decide it to be. They greatly
increase both the danger of a nuclear catastrophe, and the system which
makes it increasingly likely.
Change
the World by Changing
Yourself About War
|
Top
|
|